-
A talk/workshop on the soft, squishy, messy world of humans meeting process and technology: stone age brains,behavioural patterns and success factors in tech projects. Etc. (Despite being many words per slide, probably won't read coherently. Sorry.)
-
Accessible PowerPoint - Publishing on the Web
-
The RSA's carbon offset/carbon trading vetnure. Via Tarbox.
-
Five stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance.
-
Seven stages: shock, denial, anger, bargaining, depression, testing, acceptance.
-
Self goes shore fossicking: "I myself came up with a more contemporary artefact: a BlackBerry. Andy conceded it was an interesting discovery, but suggested I chuck it back in the river: “It’s the archaeology of the future,” he admonished me.
-
What this means is that if we are to build networks of value, then each person on the network needs to find value for themselves before they can contribute value to the network
-
Fantastic example of a new social architectural literature, psychopaternography: DPH on the sites of OKH. Makes me very sad that they'll be soon leaving us for a sunnier locus. Great stuff.
-
"Humans think; and because we think, dissonance theory demonstrated that our behavior transcends the effects of rewards and punishments and often contradicts them."
-
Denise's pixel art seems to go far beyond the rest: clouds hovering in a separate layer, and the blurred sections are precise yet faded, like delftware. That's brilliant. What innovations remain? Probably the puncturing of the strict isometric projection.
« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »
July 31, 2007
Crowd psychology: evacuation behaviour patterns
Evacuation
A few weeks ago I went to Heathrow to meet up with and see off my beloved aunt and uncle, who'd been visiting the UK from Melbourne. I got the tube from North London, they a taxi from Harefield. But I didn't see them because Terminal 3 was evacuated due to a bomb scare. I hung around in the crowd in case I managed to see them afterwards, and started thinking about the behavioural patterns below (disclaimer: obviously, I'm not a psychologist), some of which seem equally applicable to workplace situations.
Stages of acceptance and information desire
Disbelief: waiting to be told several times in case the officer and tannoy announcements aren't really serious. The choruses of "tcha" and "gah!" and "typical" that progress through the crowd. (Is there a Kübler-Ross progression of denial, rage and later acceptance at work here?) There's an irritable obedience, as if the inconvenience is deliberately and personally targeted at us. And that obedience is minimal - "No, keep moving back please, further back".
There's a profound information need: people want a lot of info and context, immediately and continuously. Desire to manage/minimise uncertainty/danger (and to be reassured); it's also a participatory voyeurism. If we're going to be held up and miss the plane, we want it to be something good rather than a false alarm (also because this legitimises the officials).
Authority and gossip
Officials should be omniscient: we assume they all have total information. Police and officials need an air of calm authority - they should and would never say "I don't know what the situation is". That they're bristling with kit and guns helps. But where there's an insufficiency of information, gossip and rumour necessarily emerge spontaneously. A police officer turns to another and murmurs, and we strain like night-time deer to catch and sift the sounds. News provision: many of us call or text friends to share news, boast of hardship or solicit sympathy.
Copying: if one officer stands at the border answering questions, then they'll get a steady stream of people all asking what's going on - we lurch forward, twitching that we might not be left out of the loop. (Here is where a constant broadcast of information, either over a tannoy or via mobile, would be useful. Except that often there is no news to convey.)
An hour in, there's a sound exactly halfway between a gun shot/explosion and something heavy crashing into a large metal object like a skip. Perhaps this is the destruction of the suspect package. It's an obvious sound, but none of the police react to it at all.
Herding and positioning
Herding/clustering of people: together generally. In areas of perceived value: closer to terminal (ultimate goal, minimal effort), closer to the action (immediate goal: info - again, the psychological benefits - curiosity/rubbernecking, gossip, privilege), out of rain, near seats (comfort for longer waits), local gatherings: families, friends, people that are identified as similar. Is there an unconsciously ethnic/sociodemographic herding happening? Grudging retreat, as a herd, if a valuable area is devalued by police officers pushing people further back.
We're shooed further away from the terminal by the police, into a space usually used only for the regulated movement of cars and buses - on foot it's a no-place, the interzone. We're held here as if this vehicle corridor is a real place, outside a processing space attached to the aerial corridor.
An awareness that when the evacuation is over there will be a rush: hence positioning is important. The Dunkirk spirit is very mild at best. We're too put out by the delay, and too aware that when movement is restored, it's a zero-sum game at the bottlenecks. That awareness is like a background hum.
Advantage and prestige
The hum, that awareness - a crowd throb. Heightened awareness of factors that confer power, privilege, position or prestige. When some people move forward it's contagious: no-one wants to be demoted in position. We watch the officials closely for indicators. We're gradually jostling for position.
There's a casual swaggering from those that are official or quasi-official (seen it all before... I am apart from the crowd...) - they have a carefree world-weariness as a defence mechanism: I'm good enough that can afford not to pay attention or look alert. As a counter to this ploy, I find myself immediately imagining offering help to the police on the dubious credentials that my company does some IT for police services - it's a clear desire to separate myself from the herd.
Correspondingly, a just-perceptible hierarchy is being expressed amongst the officials: passengers < airport staff < staff with badges < staff with uniforms < police < police with small guns or in small vehicles < police with big guns/in big vehicles < specialist police with unusual uniforms or sniffer dogs < the unseen police commanders in the radios...
Taxiing and takeoff
A pair of false starts: staff go back into the building, but many of us assume that passengers can move too. These movements starts others off too. Then, an after shock: as we prepare to head back in, there are police radio rumours of another device, and we are held up another ten minutes. (How many of us are thinking of Ballard, and casting off our raiments of civilisation and rising up in a tide against the thin blue line of police and airport officialdom? Or worse, that we'll never leave, and will become tribes of T3.)
Later, as the all-clear is confirmed, there's the extraordinary sound of a thousand luggage trolleys setting off and accelerating across rough tarmac all at once: a stampede.
July 27, 2007
July 24, 2007
July 23, 2007
July 22, 2007
July 18, 2007
July 16, 2007
July 15, 2007
July 14, 2007
Rodcorp basics
- Rod's Art
Or go straight to the images: 2005-6, 2003-5 and 1992-2002. - Popular things
Tubemap with walklines, How we work. Elsewhere: our photos. - Contact Rodcorp
@rod or rodcorp at gmail